INFORMATION TO HELP EXPLAIN THE 2008 REVALUATION PROCESS (STATISTICAL
UPDATE) AND NEW VALUES
The
New Hampshire State Constitution mandates that New Hampshire communities
update their property values at least every 5 years. Since the
last time Durham updated values was in 2003, the Town was required
to do so this year. State law also requires valuations utilized
by communities to be “full and true.” “Full” means that the values
approximate 100% of market value. All assessing and appraisal
work is done “as of” a certain date. The date for this effort
is April 1, 2008. “True” means that the values are fair, that
is, that the same methodology is used for everyone. In the very
broadest sense, the goal of revaluations and property assessment
in New Hampshire is to ensure that no taxpayer pays more or less
than her/his fair share in support of the local (School, County,
and Town) tax burden.
Many Durham taxpayers are asking, “Since we are in a declining
market (which we are), how can assessments go up?” The answer to this question is that the last town-wide update
was done in 2003. Unless work was done to a property under a building
permit, assessments for individual properties have not changed
since then. The market reality in Durham is that since 2003, the
community has experienced a net increase in value. From 2003 to
early 2006, values increased, then leveled off in 2006 for a time,
and then began to decline as the broader New Hampshire and national
real estate market began to see a decline.
According to our assessing data base, the average sale price
(89 sales) in our 2003 update period was $316,516. The average
sale price for the 2008 update is $339,679 consisting of 75 sales.
These numbers indicate a 7.3% increase in sales prices from 2003
to 2008. Given actual sales data, assessments which were in line
with sales in 2003 need to increase at this time to meet our new
sales reality in Durham in order to be “full.” Even given the
continued real estate downtown in the United States over the last
few months, the average sale price in Durham from July 2008 through
September 2008 was $338,331 (24 sales).

As a concrete example of what has happened in the general
residential Durham real estate market over the last five years,
one specific Durham property has sold three times since 2003.
In 2003 this parcel sold for $400,000 and the Town assessed it
at $407,900. The parcel sold again in 2005 for $442,500. Finally,
in May of 2007, it sold for $430,000, and the new 2008 assessment
is $423,500.
In order to be “true” we have to analyze our market. What
the Assessing Office has found is that not all properties have
risen at the same rate. In other words just factoring up the 2003
assessments by 7.3 % would not be fair to all property classification
types. Some specific types of properties have experienced a net
increase that has been greater than others and some have actually
experienced a net decline since 2003.
Generally speaking, older, smaller homes including pre-WWII
residences with values totaling $350,000 +/- or less have retained
their value to a greater degree than newer, higher priced homes.
High end waterfront property has seen a net decline in value.
Student housing properties have experienced a dramatic increase
in value, indicated by higher sales (four separate sales involving
20 properties) and higher rents received. In 2003, the market
value for multi-unit student housing properties was around $25,000
– $30,000 per bed. Recent sales indicate an increase in value
ranging from $40,000 – $45,000+ per bed for 2008.
The Assessing Office’s analysis has included looking at relevant
sales by style, quality of construction, size, age, assessed value
and location. The basic methodology is to develop a model for
all the sales. The Assessing Office looked at sales from January
2007 through September 2008, about 140 in all, in order to get
a broader perspective concerning the overall real estate market
in Durham. The model developed matches new assessments as close
as possible to these actual sales, then transfers the rates, tables
and factors from these sales to all the non-sale properties. This
is done in a global fashion by our assessing computer software
to ensure that every parcel is treated in the same way. The results
meet universal assessing practice standards and are intended to
be “full and true.”
The final increase
to the taxable property base for 2008 is as follows:
2007 (Current)
2008 (Final) %increase
Residential $669,477,806
$702,171,406 5%
Multi family $61,061,500
$94,682,000 55%
Comm/ Indus $85,367,941
$92,222,034 8%
_____________
____________
Total Valuation:
$815,907,247 $889,075,440
Many property owners
have come in to meet with Assessor Robb Dix and have offered good
information about their individual properties and about the town-wide
results. The Assessing Office welcomed this information and used
it to further refine results and make changes on individual assessments
as appropriate.
Some of the results
of the meetings with Mr. Dix were:
1.
It was determined that most of the proposed assessments
in the Wedgewood subdivision (Cutts Road, Ffrost Drive, etc.)
exceeded the sales. Therefore a 5% deduction to the house value
was given to every property in the subdivision. For the sake
of fairness, it is important to apply the reduction to all properties
within the subdivision and not just the sale properties.
2.
For the same reasons as #1 above, market adjustments were
given to house values on Stone Wall Way (-5%), Little John Road
(-5%), and Edendale Lane (-10%).
3.
When undertaking the initial sales analysis, it was found
that land values were reduced on Sumac Lane and Laurel Lane sales.
Unfortunately the same reductions were not applied to the other
non-sale properties on those roads so that was corrected and applied
to all properties.
4.
Due to testimony from taxpayers it was concluded that larger,
older homes were assessed too highly, so all older houses (pre-1940)
received a uniform downward adjustment.
5.
In the student housing segment land values increased based
on a dollars per bed calculation of $20,000/bed. The Assessing
Office solicited information before the update from multi-unit
owners to see if our “bed counts” were correct but none were supplied.
As a result of the hearings the Assessing Office did receive some
more accurate information so values on specific individual properties
were adjusted to reflect the correct number of beds.
6.
Other assessments were changed on a property specific basis
for reasons such as data corrections, requested visits to houses
to verify inaccuracies, and previously unknown information which
was brought to our attention.
As indicated
above the average single family home assessment went up 5% while
the multi-unit student housing stock and other commercial property
increased by 55% and 8%, respectively. This produces what is called
a “burden shift,” which occurs when one class of property increases
in value to a greater degree than another. Thus the relative burden
of taxation shifts. When the burden shifts one class of property
pays more and another pays less.
Although
the average residential increase was 5%, the total increase in
taxable valuation has reduced the tax rate by approximately 5.5%
which may result in some lower tax bills for residential properties.
For comparison, the 2007 increase in the tax rate was 3.5%, 2006
tax rate increase was 4.2%, and the 2005 tax rate increase was
4.2%.
TAX
RATE IMPACT OF FINAL VALUES
By utilizing the new
final 2008 property valuations generated to date by the Durham
Assessing Office, the 2008 tax rate has been set at $26.67, an
approximate 5.5% decrease.
| |
ACTUAL
2007 TAX RATE USING 2007 ASSESSING VALUES |
ACTUAL
2008 TAX
RATE
USING 2008
ASSESSING
VALUES |
| TOWN |
$6.90 |
$6.52 |
| COUNTY |
$2.27 |
$2.15 |
| LOCAL SCHOOL |
$16.55 |
$15.74 |
| STATE SCHOOL |
$2.52 |
$2.26 |
| |
|
|
| TOTAL TAX RATE |
$28.24 |
$26.67 |
To demonstrate the tax impact of the 2008 final
values for an average household ranging in valuation from $250,000
- $350,000, with an assumed increase in property valuation of
5%, the Business Office has produced the following illustration
showing that there would be
an impact on actual taxes paid ranging from between ($59) to ($83).
|
2007
PROPERTY APPRAISAL |
2007
TAXES
(RATE
$28.24) |
ASSUMED
2008
PROPERTY APPRAISAL |
2008
TAXES (RATE $26.67) |
DIFFERENCE
|
| $250,000 |
$7,060 |
$262,500 |
$7,001 |
($59) |
| $300,000 |
$8,472 |
$315,000 |
$8,401 |
($71) |
| $325,000 |
$9,178 |
$341,250 |
$9,101 |
($77) |
| $350,000 |
$9,884 |
$367,500 |
$9,801 |
($83) |
In
order to assist Durham property owners in better understanding
the revaluation process, you will find below a number of frequently
asked questions and answers. In addition, do not hesitate to
contact the Durham Assessing Office at (603) 868-8065.
WHAT
CAUSES PROPERTY VALUES TO CHANGE?
A property's
value can change for many reasons. The most obvious is that the
property changes. A bedroom, garage, or swimming pool is added,
or part of the property is destroyed by flood or fire. But the
most frequent cause of a change in value is a change in the market.
If a town's major industry leaves, property values can fall dramatically.
As deteriorating neighborhoods with good housing stock are discovered
by young homebuyers, prices gradually rise, and then may soar
as the neighborhood becomes fashionable. A shortage of detached
houses or apartments in a desirable town neighborhood can send
prices to extremely high levels. In a recession, larger homes
may stay on the market for a long time, but more affordable homes
are in demand, so their prices rise. In a stable neighborhood,
with no extraordinary pressure from the market, inflation may
increase property value.
IF
ASSESSED VALUE RISES, DO TAXES HAVE TO RISE?
No.
IF
ASSESSED VALUE FALLS, DO TAXES HAVE TO FALL?
No.
HOW
DOES VALUATION AFFECT WHAT YOU PAY AS PART OF YOUR LOCAL PROPERTY
TAX BILL?
School,
County, and Town budgets decide how much money the property tax
has to raise each year to pay for services offered. For illustrative
purposes, we will use a figure of $1 million.
Municipal
assessors estimate the total assessed value of all taxable property
in the community. For illustrative purposes, we will use a figure
of $100 million.
A tax
rate is calculated by dividing the amount of tax to be raised
($1 million) by the total assessed value ($100 million): $1 million/$100
million = 1 percent.
Therefore,
if your home’s assessed value is $100,000, your tax bill would
be calculated by multiplying the assessed value by the percent
as determined above: .01 x $100,000 = $1,000.
If the
total assessed value in a community doubles to $200 million, and
the amount to be raised stays the same, the tax rate would be
calculated as follows: $1 million/$200 million = 1/2 percent.
If your home doubles in value as a result of a revaluation, the taxes
will be calculated as: .005 x $200,000 = $1,000 so there would
be no change in taxes.
IF YOU ARE CONCERNED WITH YOUR VALUATION, WHAT
INFORMATION WOULD BE HELPFUL TO SHARE WITH THE ASSESSING OFFICE?
Expressing a concern about your valuation is not a complaint about
higher taxes. It is an attempt to prove that your property's estimated
market value is either inaccurate or unfair. Information that
would be of assistance to the Assessing Office in addressing issues
of valuation includes:
- Items that affect value
are incorrect on your property record. For example, you have
one bath, not two. You have a carport, not a garage. Your home
has 1,600 square feet not 2,000 square feet.
- If you believe the estimated
market value is too high, it will be helpful if you have evidence
that similar properties in comparable neighborhoods have sold
for less than the estimated market value of your property.
- The estimated market value
of your property is accurate but inequitable because it is higher
than the estimated value of similar properties in comparable
neighborhoods.
THE CONNECTION BETWEEN PROPERTY TAXES, VALUATIONS,
AND SPENDING?
Properties are appraised so that all local taxpayers can absorb
their fair share of the cost of running School, County, and Town
government in proportion to the amount of money individual properties
are worth. The local property tax is the primary source of taxpayer
dollars designed to support local government spending.
HOW PROPERTY IS APPRAISED
To
find the value of any piece of property the assessor must first
know the price at which properties similar to it are selling,
what it would cost to replace it, how much it takes to operate
and keep the property in repair, what rent it may earn, and many
other financial facts affecting its value, such as the current
rate of interest charged for borrowing the money to buy or build
properties similar to the parcel in question. Using these facts,
an assessor can then go about finding the property value in three
different ways:
1.
Sales
comparison approach
The first method compares a given property to others that have
sold recently. These prices, however, must be analyzed very carefully
to get a clear understanding of the market. One property may have
sold for more than it was really worth because the buyer was in
a hurry and would pay any price. Another may have sold for less
money than it was actually worth because the owner needed cash
right away. When using the sales comparison approach, the assessor
must always consider such overpricing or under pricing and analyze
many sales to arrive at a fair valuation for a given property.
Size, quality, condition, location, and time of sale are also
important factors to consider.
2.
Cost
approach
A second method to value a given property is based on how much
money it would take, at current material and labor costs, to replace
it with one similar. If a property is not new, the assessor must
also estimate how much a lot like the one in question would be
worth if vacant.
3.
Income
approach
The third method to value a given property is to evaluate how
much income the subject property would produce if it were rented
as an apartment house, a store, a factory, etc. The assessor must
consider operating expenses, taxes, insurance, maintenance costs,
and the return most people would expect on this kind of property.
WHY ASSESSED VALUES MAY CHANGE FROM YEAR TO YEAR
When
market value changes, naturally so does assessed value. For instance,
if a property owner were to add a garage to a home, the assessed
value would increase. However, if a property is in poor repair,
the assessed value would decrease. The assessor has not created
the value. Owners, buyers, and sellers create value by their transactions
in the marketplace. A town, acting through the assessor, simply
has the legal responsibility to study these transactions and appraise
properties accordingly at a minimum of every five years per New
Hampshire law.
ASSESSED VALUE AND THE TAX RATE
The Assessor's Office has nothing to do with the total amount
of taxes collected. The assessor's primary responsibility is to
find the fair market value of a given property, so that individual
property owners pay only their fair share of the taxes in a community.
The amount of tax a taxpayer pays is determined by a tax rate
applied to a given property's assessed value.
WHAT ARE YOUR RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES?
If a property owner’s opinion of the value of a given property
differs from the Assessor's opinion, it is important to discuss
this with the Assessor. The Assessing Office often relies on the
property owner for information. Property owners can help by providing
accurate information.
THE ABATEMENT PROCESS
If,
after meeting informally with the Town Assessor as part of the
ongoing revaluation (statistical update) process, taxpayers still
believe that their property is inequitably assessed, they may
formally apply for a property tax abatement. The time period for
filing a tax abatement application is AFTER the issuance of the
final tax bill (generally sent out in November) and ON OR BEFORE
the following March 1st. It is the taxpayer's responsibility to
provide documentation in support of an abatement request. Forms
are available at the Town Hall, or follow www.state.nh.us/btla/
to the forms.
PROPERTY TAX
EXEMPTIONS AND CREDITS
Applications for Exemptions
and Tax Credits are available in the Durham Assessor's Office,
and must be filed by April 15th preceding the notice of tax. For
more information regarding application procedures and definitions,
contact the Assessor's Office or refer to New
Hampshire Revised Statutes Online.
Exemption
for the Disabled
Exemption
for the Blind
Exemption
for the Elderly
Veterans
or Veterans Widow Tax Credit
Tax
Credit for Service-Connected Total Disability
Exemption
for Certain Disabled Veterans
Exemption
for Improvements to Assist Persons with Disabilities
Solar
Energy Systems Exemption